identification, analysis and interaction process. Example statements were ‘I liked all the strategies’, ‘the tailoring of the presentation’ and ‘the interpreter’. Department of Health Policy and Community Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA, Bridges for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Nashville, TN, USA, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Eligibility criteria for researchers included: (a) having a doctoral degree (e.g., MD, PhD and DrPH), (b) conducts formative or summative research, (c) has or plans to disseminate research findings to the community and (d) receipt of external grant funding. Specifically, they were asked questions on barriers to research dissemination, resources/changes needed to engage in research dissemination at their institution, and needs and expectations of community partners to engage in research dissemination. This describes the process of gauging the best strategies for research dissemination. Nine additional participants (three from each community partner and three from the Latino community) were purposefully recruited for 60‐minute cognitive interviews to determine cultural appropriateness of the strategies using constituent‐involving, socio‐cultural, linguistic, evidential and peripheral strategies.31 These participants were in the original study or were members of communities underrepresented in research. Majority had a bachelor's degree or lower (90.4%) and employed full time (58.2%). Different dissemination strategies will be used for different stakeholders. Based on the data, we made changes to each strategy (see Table 2). Furthermore, representation of community and researchers could have been more diverse. In phase one, step one involves the development of an academic‐community partnership and step two is the development of a dissemination team from members of each partnering organization to conduct phase two. Dissemination strategies may vary at each level during framework application. (2019) found that only 27% of researchers of clinical trials disseminated results to the participants.5 In a study reporting dissemination in community‐based participatory research (CBPR), only 23% of researchers disseminated results to the public and 26% disseminated results to community participants at each stage of the research process (Chen et al 2010).6 Lack of communication about study results to these groups, particularly minority communities, strains the community‐academic partnership7 and contributes to mistrust in medical research(ers) and the health‐care system.8 Subsequently, this affects CBOs’ and community members’ understanding and willingness to engage in research opportunities.9, 10 This delays the identification of new evidence‐based knowledge, questions the generalizability of findings, and lessens use of research to improve health outcomes.11, Stakeholders on multiple levels increasingly recognize the value in research dissemination to study participants and the community‐at‐large. Invite and engage others … The plan will be updated and reviewed by partners throughout the project lifetime as work progresses and new opportunities for dissemination emerge and are identified. 4. Dissemination of research findings to past study participants and the community‐at‐large is important. Cognitive interview participants suggested modifying content of one‐pager, video, and town hall meeting agenda to increase cultural appropriateness. We used the articles to identify key concepts of research dissemination. Research Review. and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks, A framework for disseminating evidence‐based health promotion practices, Researcher readiness for participating in community‐engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies, A multilevel approach to stakeholder engagement in the formulation of a clinical data research network, Comprehensive strategy for capturing and integrating community input into community research training curricula, Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review‐derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. On March 4th and 5th, 2020, Public Safety Canada’s (PS) National Office for Victims (NOV) met with victim stakeholders and non-governmental organizations to discuss the role of victims in the federal corrections and conditional release system, and their Right to information under the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights (CVBR). Roundtable panelists represented various stakeholder groups (e.g., patient advocacy groups, providers, clinicians, caregivers, payers, purchasers, medical education groups, Stakeholders are invited and strongly encouraged to use deliverables to the best possible Behind headlines such as this one are the overwhelming issues which threaten the nursing workforce: 1) staffing cuts, 2) mandatory overtime, and 3) the. Table 4 demonstrates participants trust in medical research and medical researchers pre‐ and post‐town halls of dissemination of research findings. At paperdue.com, we provide students the tools they need to streamline their studying, researching, and writing tasks. Researchers were asked additional questions in the interview about research dissemination and the role their institution and community partners play in their ability to participate. Dissemination is the process of delivering the outcome of the project to the key stakeholders and the wide community. The process starts with the identification of the project users (Ventilation associated pneumonia patients), gathering data to be used in determining if the user received output, identification of process of transmission and ends, Cross-Sectional Study to Determine Factors in the Educational Advancement of the Licensed Practical Nurse to the Registered Nurse in the State of North Carolina We conducted a systematic literature review applying a ‘purposive’ search and article selection to gather dissemination concepts.28 This is not the traditional approach of exhausting the literature on the topic.29 We conducted the review in PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO from September 2018 to May 2019 using key words ‘dissemination’, ‘implementation’, ‘conceptual framework’, ‘research results’, ‘engagement’, ‘evidence‐based’ and ‘partnership’. It is provided in a format that could be used in recording the stakeholder … Using a deductive approach, we used a constant comparison analysis to iteratively compare codes to determine which steps and its process in the research dissemination framework should be kept, removed, added or clarified. The importance of effective communication with a project’s stakeholders is something that shouldn’t be overlooked.. PRINCE2 ® describes detailed techniques only when related to one of its recommended approaches or one that is unique to its method. We recruited using word of mouth, CBOs and flyers. EN. Methodologically, application of CEnR and partnership principles at each level using this framework is essential. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches, Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, Development of a measure to assess patient trust in medical researchers, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Socio‐ecological model as a framework for overcoming barriers and challenges in randomized control trials in minority and undeserved communities, Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement, https://www.pcori.org/about‐us/our‐programs/engagement, Receipt of Grant Funding (eg NIH, PCORI and CDC), Dissemination of Research Findings to Community After a Study or Plan to. Within the established steps of stakeholder engagement, fostering interaction among stakeholders about data use early in the project life cycle helps researchers plan for the effective dissemination of findings. Our framework has components which overlap with existing frameworks for community engagement, CBPR, partnership development, and dissemination and implementation.16, 22 However, we define a framework that addresses an important gap to expand conceptualization of dissemination from academics to the community. 2020. Strategies for Dissemination To develop an effective, systematic process to improve academic‐community partners’ engagement in research dissemination to communities, we: (a) conducted a literature review to identify best practices and current frameworks; (b) developed an initial framework; (c) elicited feedback on the framework by conducting cognitive interviews with researchers, community leaders and members; (d) evaluated the framework, and (e) finalized the framework using study results. The innovation must be readily usable and credible. The Romanian stakeholders should become aware of the TRAP project’s scope and agenda and how these are connected to their own needs and priorities. The overall aim of the stakeholder engagement and dissemination activities was to ensure stakeholder involvement was an integral part of the process, and at different phases, this involvement took the form of sharing information, consulting, engaging in dialogue or deliberating on outputs. Burns, N. (2007). *Not Affiliated, Sponsored or Endorsed by any University. The main objective of dissemination is sharing the information that has been produced from the evaluation with other parties. Using a line‐by‐line coding technique, we coded the text with the a priori codes ‘keep’, ‘remove’, ‘add’ or ‘clarify’ as defined in the codebook. PCORI began the process for developing its D&I Action Plan by convening multiple stakeholders at a roundtable and webinar event in July 2013 (see Figure 1). To evaluate the proposed framework, we used a previously published18 study to provide the research findings to study participants and the community‐at‐large. What criteria were used to determine the need for the program? This ensures that dissemination efforts meet all stakeholders’ needs.36 Hence, dissemination strategies, implementation procedures, and evaluation methods and tools are effective to inform evidence‐based practices and policies for dissemination. Interviews were audio‐recorded. In this section, we present the method/mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed solution. We developed a framework and strategies to guide community‐academic partnerships in community‐targeted, dissemination efforts. Table 2 describes the interview results of researchers and the community along with how their input was integrated into the framework. This increases research relevance while meeting the needs of the community, including past research participants. Using 11 community listening sessions, the study identified the research concerns and barriers to research participation among underrepresented populations (i.e., low socio‐economic status, African American, Latino, deaf and hard of hearing). The process of dissemination of drought information is conceptualized in Figure 5 and has been described by 19 out of 25 KII. The JA dissemination strategy provides the basis for engaging with stakeholders through their identification, analysis and interaction process. Orthopedic Nursing, 19(3), 47-49, 52. Methods of Dissemination Once the dissemination objective and the audience are identified, there are a variety of ways to share the developed content. CEnR and partnership principles are incorporated throughout each step. Future studies are needed to confirm these results. We also identify five standards to determine the quality of the dissemination effort(s): (a) utility; (b) feasibility; (c) ethics; (d) communication; and (e) ommunity Input. The … Abstract. The additional information collected will be reported elsewhere. Upon completion, researchers were compensated a $75 gift card for their 75‐minute interview and community members a $25 gift card for their 20‐minute interview. Dissemination refers to making knowledge about your project available and accessible to target... Establishing the dissemination plan. It is intended to provide clarity and transparency on the process and make tools available in the form of adaptive procedures and templates. Evaluation plan PCORI is committed to transparency and a rigorous stakeholder-driven process that emphasizes patient engagement. The title was 1‐ACCORD: Aspiring to Connect Communities and Researchers through Dissemination. Note: Partnership may be existing or should be created. Stakeholders can be found anywhere for a project. Questions asked during evaluation planning also should consider the program’s conceptual framework or underpinnings. Strategy for disseminating results of project to key, Disseminating Evidence Front-line health workers, supervisors, researchers, patients, policy makers, or the media. Involving consumers and other stakeholders in the dissemination planning process, as well as the guideline development phase will help you make sure that the format and language of any products is appropriate, useful and accessible (see the Consumer involvement and Engaging stakeholders modules). Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Dissemination strategies include the definition of objectives, a clearly defined action planning (what has to be achieved, by whom, when, results, monitoring), iteration cycles to collect feedback from all stakeholders, systematic impact assessment and so on. This describes the process of executing the dissemination plan and concurrent or subsequent evaluation while incorporating community input. However, this was an initial framework developed using CEnR and partnership principles to describe a dissemination process. Abbreviations: CBO, community‐based organization; CM, community member. Using these results, the partners added strategies to culturally target the dissemination strategies and to engage community in the dissemination process. There are five standards to be upheld conducting these phases. This research identified the needs, priorities, and recommendations for underrepresented groups to participate in research.18 This work was conducted through a community‐academic partnership (one academic partner and two community organizations). Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 ; Evaluation • Level of involvement of each group? Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful change proposal project implementation. This framework was developed using community member and researcher feedback. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute . The framework: (a) guides researchers to engage in community research dissemination; (b) ensures community engagement principles in all phases of planning and implementing dissemination; (c) ensures ethical guidelines are met; (d) increases value and usability of research findings for community members and CBOs; and (e) ensures all stakeholder needs are met for evaluation. Last, the result of dissemination efforts can influence policies for the funders, health‐care system, and CBOs. A t test evaluated the bivariate association between trust in medical research and researchers pre‐ and post‐town hall. Web.2 December. Translator. If you identify a group or department, make sure you identify the correct individual stakeholders within a stakeholder group. Then, we developed an initial framework depicting the process for dissemination to research participants and community‐at‐large. Ethics refers to conducting the dissemination process in a way that is acceptable and protects the welfare of the community. Special attention will also paid to the transfer of knowledge to Eastern European countries through, conference presentations in these countries. What predicts dissemination efforts among public health researchers in the United States? This Section includes guidance on planning for dissemination. The engagement of stakeholders by researchers is a process that can help prevent the know-do gap. This work was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Meharry Medical College and Vanderbilt University. WP2 is at the disposal of stakeholders to identify and put into practice ways of reaching the largest possible audience. They then analysed the data using a deductive, constant comparative approach to edit the dissemination strategies iteratively. Using this framework at the individual level is the most fundamental with the greatest potential for an individual to engage in a behaviour change to improve public health outcomes.35 Engaging the community as partners in dissemination efforts can influence knowledge, attitudes, and self‐efficacy regarding research, and ultimately their participation. 3. Which target audience(s) do you want to reach? At community, organizational, and societal levels, commitment and political controversy may increase with each level.35 Changes are hardest at these levels, yet have the potential to produce the greatest results. Implement dissemination programme and evaluation. Translate texts with the world's best machine translation technology, developed by the creators of Linguee. One‐Pager. Research data are not shared due to ethical restrictions. We hope that these design principles will help to inform the future development of stakeholder engagement as a mechanism for promoting research impact. How can your stakeholders help you to define and reach your target audience(s)? Implementing this process could build rapport and trust in communities, particularly those underrepresented in research, influencing research participation and public health outcomes. This work was supported by the Meharry‐Vanderbilt Alliance Internal Funds, the National Institutes of Health, under the award number U54MD007586. Thus, dissemination efforts should take into consideration the characteristics of policymakers. Proposal Reduction Early Hospital Readmissions Older Adults Change... Disseminating Projects Outcome to Key Stakeholders and Nursing Community Essay. Using existing data, the framework's utility was evaluated in seven town hall meetings (n = 117). For example, does the program have the clarity of objectives or transparency in its methods required for evaluation? Ideally, these individuals will be ready and receptive to recommendations, since the evaluation process will have incorporated the priorities and interests of these groups (see Focusing the Evaluation). It involves convincing stakeholders in target groups to adopt an intervention. Dissemination is a horizontal activity and concentrates on disseminating the results of VERITE project itself to a wide range of existing or potential stakeholders. All one really has to know is who the project stakeholders are and what types of … An experienced research team member (i.e., researcher or graduate assistant) conducted the cognitive interviews by phone or in‐person. It occurs as and when the result of programmes and initiatives become available. This describes the intent of the programme to assist in evaluating the dissemination process. First, we identified and combined similar concepts related to the return of findings to the community. By applying these and other ideas, scientific discoveries will no longer “sit on the shelf” but will realize practice application in public health agencies and policy -making bodies. The average age was 48, and household size was 3. Common methods of dissemination include: Publishing program or policy briefs. Utility ensures the dissemination process meets the needs of all stakeholders. Once the evaluation is completed, it is important to share the results and/or evaluation procedures with a variety of stakeholders. There are four steps in the dissemination process of phase two: identify the dissemination purpose, determine dissemination strategies, design dissemination programme, and implement dissemination programme and evaluation with a by‐product of a dissemination tangible. A stakeholder is a group or person who has interests that may be affected by an initiative or has influence over it. (See Supplementary File A for initial framework.) Dissemination refers to the process of sharing research findings with stakeholders and wider audiences. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for disseminating evaluation results to program stakeholders. Decisions about the extent and scope of KT plans should be guided by the reliability, validity, strength, and significance of research findings. stakeholders (health authorities, NGOs, policy makers, and scientific community); - To promote the project’s outputs and results. At community and organizational levels, these groups can: (a) partner with academicians to conduct dissemination efforts guided by this framework and (b) promote policy changes in CBOs and community‐at‐large based on dissemination effects. This will ensure that key stakeholders can contribute to, and act on the findings in a timely fashion. Using post‐survey data and our experience, we finalized the content and structure of the framework. Wyatt, S. Finn, R.Wadhwa, K. et al. To ensure an effective process, we provide five standards to guide planning and implementation of the dissemination effort. Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful change proposal project implementation. Someone has to be the point person. Table 3 describes participants’ willingness to take part in research pre‐ and post‐town halls of dissemination of research findings. Once the warning information has been generated, it is transmitted to the District Agricultural Development Office (DADO), the District Civil Protection Committee (DCPC), and district meteorological offices. What did you like least about the event?). The dissemination of research findings is a critical component of the knowledge translation (KT) process and is frequently thought to occur somewhere between the generation and synthesis of knowledge. We also would like to thank the researchers who assisted in the development of the framework. The one‐pager was distributed during the town hall, and it provided information on the study and its results. We combined text excerpts from each post‐survey and analysed the data using the codebook and comparable data analysis used in framework and strategy development. This process is called dissemination. PCORI uses a variety of forums and public comment periods to obtain public input to enhance its work. Chapter Seven - Determining the dissemination plan: Internal and external considerations Data dissemination. Dissemination of Findings: How to Share Results. Presenting at national conferences and meetings of professional associations. In conjunction with the developmental evaluation, implementing a new dissemination process with each PHC audit tool dataset provides the team with multiple opportunities to reflect and respond to stakeholder feedback, drawing on evidence and available resources to make and test refinements to processes, reports, and supporting materials. Below is a brief description of the strategies. dissemination (sharing the results) can help achieve the goals. dissemination process? Reference The dissemination activities will be implemented at local, national and European level Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Stakeholders play an important role in the further development of eHealth progress. These frameworks offer important concepts on dissemination, and some further demonstrate the importance of stakeholder engagement in this process. Phase one is a preliminary planning phase with two steps, and phase two is the four‐step dissemination process. Partners that align with dissemination goals are chosen to address the dissemination effort. Post‐survey items only included: (a) 12‐item scale on trust in medical research and medical researchers33; (b) two items on willingness to participate in research; and (c) six items rating the event (e.g., What did you like most about the event? Dissemination, communication and The engagement of stakeholders by researchers is a process that can help prevent the know-do gap. Post‐intervention, bivariate results indicated there was a significant difference in trust in medical research and researchers (t(205) = −2.86, P = .006) and willingness to participate in research (χ2(2) = 8.62, P = .013; see Tables 3 and 4). It is a central guideline document for the MONICA Consortium in communicating and disseminating MONICA to external stakeholders as well as for … Enter your email address below and we will send you your username, If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username, Community Engaged Research Disseminatino (CERD) Framework for Research Findings, Jennifer Cunningham‐Erves PhD, MPH, MAEd, MS, CHES, orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7780-9874, I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of Use, Dissemination, implementation, and improvement science research in population health: opportunities for Public Health and CTSAs, Getting the word out: new approaches for disseminating public health science, Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed, Disseminating results: community response and input on Kisumu breastfeeding study, Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed, Dissemination of results in community‐based participatory research, African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation, Factors that influence African‐Americans' willingness to participate in medical research studies, Barriers to clinical research participation among African Americans, Why we need community engagement in medical research, Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study, Relationships hold the key to trustworthy and productive translational science: recommendations for expanding community engagement in biomedical research, Dissemination as dialogue: building trust and sharing research findings through community engagement, Return of research results to study participants: uncharted and untested, Engaging the community in the dissemination, implementation, and improvement of health‐related research, Community‐derived research dissemination strategies in an Inuit community, Needs, priorities, and recommendations for engaging underrepresented populations in clinical research: a community perspective, Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: a survey of cancer patients, Strategies for disseminating recommendations or guidelines to patients: a systematic review, Development of a Planning Tool to Guide Research Dissemination, Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research, Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? Publishing project findings in national journals and statewide publications. Recruitment sites were CBOs (e.g., community health centres, colleges and churches) representative of original study participants and the community‐at‐large. The process of dissemination of drought information is conceptualized in Figure 5 and has been described by 19 out of 25 KII. Common methods of dissemination include: Publishing program or policy briefs; Publishing project findings in national journals and statewide publications; Presenting at national conferences and meetings of professional associations; … Over time, dissemination efforts at each level can promote systemic and sustained changes in research participation and preventive behaviours, resulting in improved health outcomes. As a consequence, one major challenge for the communication and dissemination activities of PP 7 - INCDMTM is to make the Romanian The purpose of this procedure is to ensure a clearly defined and effective process of disseminating and promoting all existing policies and procedures to all EIT staff and students and other stakeholders, so that they can understand and apply them as well as providing channels to provide feedback on improvements and enhancements. Future studies should explore ways for sample representativeness for framework evolution. We provided pre‐ and post‐surveys to evaluate these strategies collectively. For patients and their families, the dissemination, Baker, 2000).The measurement of project effectiveness, an element of project impact evaluation, is crucial for the success of every proposed project. RECODE. Once the warning information has been generated, it is transmitted to the District Agricultural Development Office (DADO), the District Civil Protection Committee (DCPC), and district meteorological offices. This Checklist is abstracted from the K2A guidance and is intended to serve as an example of a tool that can assist PRCs in dissemination planning. Dissemination strategies include the definition of objectives, a clearly defined action planning (what has to be achieved, by whom, when, results, monitoring), iteration cycles to collect feedback from all stakeholders, systematic impact assessment and so on.